US Supreme Court upholds rules protecting ride-hailing firms’ ride-sharing services

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft are protected from state regulation.

The high court ruled in a 4-4 ruling that ride sharing services like ride-HUB and are not “intermediaries” that could pose a threat to the public interest.

Uber and ride sharing are subject to the same regulatory burdens as other taxis and limousines.

The justices left in place the ruling from the lower courts that Uber and others like it are not an intermediary that could harm the public.

The ruling was a victory for Uber and other ride sharing companies, who have been fighting to remain exempt from New York City’s ride-hare laws since they began operating in 2015.

Uber was granted an exemption from those laws in April, but a federal judge struck down the state’s ban on the services.

That ruling led to a court battle that dragged on for months.

The state sued Uber and several of its executives, saying they were profiting from their business model and are not intermediaries that could hurt the public’s interest.

The lawsuit said Uber and its drivers are “partners in the enterprise” of transporting people around the city and were not “operating as an agency of government.”

The justices ruled 5-4 in favor of Uber and five of its companies.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan said she had concerns about the company’s business model.

“I think we have a right to know whether this company is an intermediary in the marketplace, whether it is an enabler in the market, whether this is something that we should be concerned about,” Kagan wrote.

The court also allowed Uber and six of its employees, including founder Travis Kalanick, to appeal the ruling to the full Supreme Court.

Uber’s attorney, John Burris, said the ruling should not have been appealed and that the companies have every right to appeal.

Uber and Lyft have been battling for years in New York state’s courts over how to regulate the ride-hopping companies.

Uber has challenged the state law banning its services, arguing that it violates its owners’ First Amendment rights.

Uber argued that the state has a legitimate interest in protecting the public from the dangers of unregulated ride-booking.

Kalanick and other Uber executives have said they have done nothing wrong.

They argue that the company is simply serving as a taxi service, and that they should not be subject to state laws.

스폰서 파트너

【우리카지노】바카라사이트 100% 검증 카지노사이트 - 승리카지노.【우리카지노】카지노사이트 추천 순위 사이트만 야심차게 모아 놓았습니다. 2021년 가장 인기있는 카지노사이트, 바카라 사이트, 룰렛, 슬롯, 블랙잭 등을 세심하게 검토하여 100% 검증된 안전한 온라인 카지노 사이트를 추천 해드리고 있습니다.우리카지노 | Top 온라인 카지노사이트 추천 - 더킹오브딜러.바카라사이트쿠폰 정보안내 메리트카지노(더킹카지노),샌즈카지노,솔레어카지노,파라오카지노,퍼스트카지노,코인카지노.우리카지노 - 【바카라사이트】카지노사이트인포,메리트카지노,샌즈카지노.바카라사이트인포는,2020년 최고의 우리카지노만추천합니다.카지노 바카라 007카지노,솔카지노,퍼스트카지노,코인카지노등 안전놀이터 먹튀없이 즐길수 있는카지노사이트인포에서 가입구폰 오링쿠폰 다양이벤트 진행.2021 베스트 바카라사이트 | 우리카지노계열 - 쿠쿠카지노.2021 년 국내 최고 온라인 카지노사이트.100% 검증된 카지노사이트들만 추천하여 드립니다.온라인카지노,메리트카지노(더킹카지노),파라오카지노,퍼스트카지노,코인카지노,바카라,포커,블랙잭,슬롯머신 등 설명서.카지노사이트 추천 | 바카라사이트 순위 【우리카지노】 - 보너스룸 카지노.년국내 최고 카지노사이트,공식인증업체,먹튀검증,우리카지노,카지노사이트,바카라사이트,메리트카지노,더킹카지노,샌즈카지노,코인카지노,퍼스트카지노 등 007카지노 - 보너스룸 카지노.바카라 사이트【 우리카지노가입쿠폰 】- 슈터카지노.슈터카지노 에 오신 것을 환영합니다. 100% 안전 검증 온라인 카지노 사이트를 사용하는 것이좋습니다. 우리추천,메리트카지노(더킹카지노),파라오카지노,퍼스트카지노,코인카지노,샌즈카지노(예스카지노),바카라,포커,슬롯머신,블랙잭, 등 설명서.